Ask the question the repository cannot answer
Separate discoverable facts from product decisions, ask consequential questions, and turn answers into a bounded brief.
Builds on: Bounded briefs and acceptance criteria
Select useful context, recover safely, ask better questions and assess evidence.
Original Codex-focused lessons developed from the cclearn curriculum evaluation. Each follows Predict → Explain → Demonstrate → Practice → Verify → Reflect → Transfer. You can enter the unfamiliar transfer scenario first. Decisions are saved as recognition practice, separate from implementation mastery.
Separate discoverable facts from product decisions, ask consequential questions, and turn answers into a bounded brief.
Builds on: Bounded briefs and acceptance criteria
Find a relevant precedent, verify that its constraints match, and reuse conventions without preserving a known flaw.
Builds on: Repository exploration and scope control
Match a claim to a discriminating runtime or visual check, preserve its evidence, and report what remains unverified.
Builds on: Acceptance criteria and verification evidence
Treat findings as claims, investigate uncertainty and distinguish defects from preferences or unauthorized redesign.
Builds on: Diff review and evidence quality
Choose relevant observations, code and constraints while excluding secrets and unsupported diagnoses.
Builds on: Repository exploration and bounded briefs
Inventory changes and side effects, preserve evidence, and choose a bounded recovery instead of assuming undo restores everything.
Builds on: Diff review and scope control
Keep durable rules accurate and actionable; relocate task-specific detail without hiding necessary constraints.
Builds on: Task briefs, repository instructions and evidence review
Define when a reusable workflow applies, separate method from task data, and test both matching and non-matching requests.
Builds on: Task briefs, repository instructions and evidence review
Distinguish a request, an executed check and an enforced gate; require fresh, relevant evidence before dependent actions.
Builds on: Task briefs, repository instructions and evidence review